StoQuant vs StockAnalysis.com: predictive ML depth vs fundamentals-only data

StockAnalysis.com is one of the best free fundamentals sites: financials, ratios, and forecasts, fast and clean. StoQuant starts where fundamentals stop — a 149-feature ML ensemble, alternative-data signals, regime detection, and walk-forward validation of every signal.

Descriptive data vs predictive signal

StockAnalysis.com answers "what does this company look like?" extremely well — income statements, balance sheets, ratios, and analyst forecasts in a fast, free UI. But fundamentals describe the present; they do not tell you which of the 500 stocks that screen "cheap" will actually outperform next quarter. StoQuant answers that question: a 149-feature ML ensemble (LightGBM + CatBoost + XGBoost with Venn-ABERS calibration) produces a 0-100 Q-Score for 3,500+ US stocks, and the walk-forward results — hit rates, quintile spreads, out-of-sample AUC — are published on /proof.

Feature Comparison

Feature Comparison: StoQuant vs StockAnalysis.com
FeatureStoQuantStockAnalysis.com
PriceFree core tier; Power plan for full API + MCP accessFree
Free tier limitsFull Q-Score, hidden gems, and public research pagesFull access
Stocks covered3,500+ US stocks scored weeklyUS stocks
Core scoring / key differentiators149-feature ML ensemble with Venn-ABERS calibrationFinancial statements, ratios, analyst forecasts
ML / walk-forward proofPublished daily on /proofNo
AI-agent / MCP supportstoquant-mcp for Claude / AI agentsNo
Portfolio optimizationBlack-Litterman optimizerNo
Data sources14 alt-data feeds (insider, social, macro, SEC, app ranks)Fundamentals, estimates

When StockAnalysis.com is better

Choose StockAnalysis.com when you need to read financial statements, compare ratios across peers, or check analyst revenue forecasts — quickly and for free. It is one of the cleanest fundamentals UIs on the web, and we use similar data ourselves. Choose StoQuant when you have the fundamentals and need the next step: which names the model expects to outperform, confirmed by alternative data, with a published track record you can audit.

Related on StoQuant

See the Q-Score methodology at /learn/q-score-methodology, the live out-of-sample track record on /proof, and the free hidden-gems screener at /gems.

FAQ

Is StoQuant a free alternative to StockAnalysis.com?

They overlap partly. StockAnalysis.com is free for fundamentals; StoQuant is free for predictive scoring, hidden-gem screening, and insider tracking. Many investors use both: StockAnalysis.com to read the financials, StoQuant to decide what to buy.

Does StoQuant have financial statements and ratios?

Yes — fundamentals are a core input to the 149 ML features, and per-ticker research pages surface the key ratios. But our focus is turning that data into a forward-looking score, not replicating a statements viewer.

What does Q-Score add over analyst forecasts?

Analyst forecasts are slow, often conflicted, and one-dimensional. Q-Score blends analyst revisions with momentum, sentiment, insider activity, regime, and 140+ other features, then calibrates the output as a probability validated on out-of-sample data.

How many stocks does StoQuant cover?

3,500+ US stocks, each rescored within a week. We deliberately exclude micro-caps below $250M to maintain data quality and liquidity.

Can I verify StoQuant predictions actually work?

Yes. /proof publishes walk-forward validation — hit rates, quintile spreads, and out-of-sample AUC — benchmarked against buy-and-hold with realistic transaction costs.

Get the StoQuant digest — free

Weekly Q-Score signals and insider buying activity on our highest-conviction stock picks. Email only, no account needed. See a sample digest.