StoQuant vs Koyfin: predictive ML research vs fundamental data terminal

Koyfin is a Bloomberg-like data terminal with 5,900+ filters and 10-year financials. StoQuant is a predictive quant platform that validates its models out-of-sample and optimizes portfolios with Black-Litterman.

Depth of data vs predictive edge

Koyfin's strength is breadth: 5,900+ screening criteria, 10+ years of financials, global coverage, and customizable dashboards. It is the best retail tool for investors who want to analyze financial statements deeply. StoQuant's strength is prediction: we use 149 engineered features, a 3-model stacking ensemble, and Venn-ABERS calibration to produce a Q-Score that maps to a true probability of outperformance. Every day we publish the out-of-sample track record on /proof.

Feature Comparison

Feature Comparison: StoQuant vs Koyfin
FeatureStoQuantKoyfin
PriceFree core tier; Power plan for full API + MCP accessFree; paid plans for deeper data
Free tier limitsFull Q-Score, hidden gems, and public research pagesLimited dashboards and watchlists
Stocks covered3,500+ US stocks scored weekly100,000+ global equities
Core scoring / key differentiators149-feature ML ensemble with Venn-ABERS calibrationFinancial data terminal, no predictive score
ML / walk-forward proofPublished daily on /proofNo
AI-agent / MCP supportstoquant-mcp for Claude / AI agentsNo
Portfolio optimizationBlack-Litterman optimizerNo
Data sources14 alt-data feeds (insider, social, macro, SEC, app ranks)Financials, transcripts, estimates

When to choose each platform

Choose Koyfin if you need global coverage, long financial histories, and a data terminal for deep statement analysis. Choose StoQuant if you want predictive scoring, a published track record, value screening, portfolio optimization, and AI-agent access. The two tools solve different parts of the research stack.

Related on StoQuant

Compare StoQuant vs Finviz (stoquant.com/compare/finviz) or explore the Q-Score Methodology (stoquant.com/learn/q-score-methodology) and Walk-Forward Validation (stoquant.com/learn/walk-forward-validation).

FAQ

Can StoQuant replace Koyfin?

For predictive stock picking and portfolio optimization, yes. For deep 10-year financial statement analysis and global coverage, Koyfin remains stronger. Many investors use Koyfin to drill into fundamentals after StoQuant surfaces candidates.

Does StoQuant have 5,900 filters?

No. StoQuant deliberately uses a focused 149-feature predictive pipeline rather than maximizing filter count. The goal is signal quality and interpretability, not filter breadth.

Which platform is better for portfolio construction?

StoQuant. We integrate ML views with the Black-Litterman model to produce regime-aware allocations. Koyfin does not offer portfolio optimization.

Does StoQuant cover international stocks?

StoQuant currently covers US-listed stocks. Koyfin is the better choice for international equity screening.

Is StoQuant free?

Yes. The Q-Score, hidden-gem screener, and proof page are free. Power tier adds the MCP server, API, and unlimited screens.

Get the StoQuant digest — free

Weekly Q-Score signals and insider buying activity on our highest-conviction stock picks. Email only, no account needed. See a sample digest.