Simply Wall St visualizes fair value; TipRanks aggregates analyst and influencer ratings (street consensus). StoQuant publishes its own 149-feature Q-Score stack, Benjamin Graham intrinsic value, insider-cluster tracking, and a public /proof scorecard — with the screener and daily Q-Score leaderboard free. We publish the receipts; we do not claim a live out-of-sample edge on this page.
Simply Wall St is excellent at one thing: visualizing whether a company looks fairly valued today with its snowflake chart. TipRanks is excellent at a different thing: aggregating Wall Street analyst and financial-influencer ratings into a consensus. Both gate deeper research behind a subscription. StoQuant takes a different product path: every covered stock gets a single Q-Score from 0 to 100 from a 149-feature research stack (ML ensemble, Benjamin Graham intrinsic value, insider-cluster signals, HMM regime detection), plus portfolio tools and MCP research. The hidden-gem screener and the daily Q-Score leaderboard are free. Live ranking skill is not asserted here — see /proof for grade, excessSpreadPp, and dataSufficient, and judge the scorecard yourself.
| Feature | StoQuant | Simply Wall St / TipRanks |
|---|---|---|
| Free hidden-gem screener and daily leaderboard | Yes | Limited free tier; deeper research paywalled |
| Public accuracy scorecard | Published on /proof (excessSpreadPp) | No |
| ML prediction engine | LightGBM + CatBoost + XGBoost ensemble | Fair-value heuristic (SWS) / analyst consensus (TipRanks) |
| Benjamin Graham intrinsic value | Yes | Partial |
| Insider-cluster tracking | Yes | Basic insider feed |
| Small-cap focus (gems tuned $250M–$10B) | 3,500+ US stocks scored weekly | Broad coverage, less small-cap depth |
| MCP server for Claude / AI agents | Yes | No |
See the head-to-head breakdowns: StoQuant vs Simply Wall St (stoquant.com/compare/simply-wall-st). Explore the free tools: Undervalued Small Cap Stocks (stoquant.com/undervalued-small-cap-stocks) and the Best Stock Screener (stoquant.com/best-stock-screener). Learn the method: Q-Score Methodology (stoquant.com/learn/q-score-methodology).
Yes. The hidden-gem screener, the daily Q-Score leaderboard, and per-stock research are free. The Power tier adds the MCP server, full API, and unlimited custom screens, but you can do deep small-cap research without paying.
Simply Wall St visualizes current fair value with its snowflake chart. StoQuant publishes its own 149-feature Q-Score research stack and a public /proof accuracy card (excessSpreadPp). Use /proof to see whether the live tail is sufficient, flat, or inverted — this page does not claim predictive skill.
TipRanks aggregates analyst and influencer ratings into street consensus. StoQuant builds its own Q-Score from data — fundamentals, momentum, insider clusters, sentiment, and regime detection — and publishes the accuracy card on /proof. We do not claim Q-Score currently beats TipRanks; judge excessSpreadPp yourself.
Yes. StoQuant scores 3,500+ US stocks weekly, and the hidden-gem screener is tuned for undervalued small and mid caps in the $250M–$10B band — deliberately above micro-cap liquidity noise.
StoQuant is a free alternative built for exactly this: it scores 3,500+ US stocks weekly on a single 0–100 Q-Score from a 149-feature research stack, the Benjamin Graham intrinsic-value formula, insider-cluster signals, and alt-data feeds (SEC filings, FDA actions, short interest, social momentum). Unlike Simply Wall St (fair-value snowflake) or TipRanks (analyst-consensus aggregation), it publishes a public accuracy card on /proof (grade, excessSpreadPp, dataSufficient) for you to judge, and the hidden-gem screener plus daily leaderboard are free with no credit card. For AI-agent workflows it also exposes MCP tools (including compare_signal for own-Q vs street research — not TipRanks-beating alpha marketing).
No. You can open the screener and the daily leaderboard for free without entering payment details.
Free StoQuant digest by email. No account needed. See today's research picks.