Get the StoQuant digest — free

Free StoQuant digest by email. No account needed. See today's research picks.

Subscribe free

CNP vs FTS — Stock Comparison

Compare CNP and FTS side-by-side on StoQuant: CNP Q-Score 49 vs FTS 58; analyst signal 58 vs 54. Plus alt data signals, insider buying, catalysts, strategic edges, short interest, social sentiment, and macro context.

Side-by-side snapshot

• CNP — CENTERPOINT ENERGY INC · Utilities · Q-Score verdict Hold (49.0, grade C) · analyst signal 58/100 — Wall Street ratings and target changes turned into a 0-100 score · strongest signals: valuation 75/100, earnings quality 67/100 · weakest signals: analyst consensus 32/100, competitive moat 23/100. Full CNP research.
• FTS — Fortis Inc. · Utilities · market cap $28.35B · Q-Score verdict Buy (58.0, grade B) · analyst signal 54/100 — Wall Street ratings and target changes turned into a 0-100 score · strongest signals: technicals 80/100, analyst consensus 28/100 · weakest signals: ML forecast 16/100. Full FTS research.

What you can compare

• Q-Score: StoQuant's composite 0–100 rating based on 140+ financial signals.
• Alt data signals: Google Trends, EDGAR 8-K filings, job postings, and more.
• Insider activity: Cluster scores and recent Form 4 buying.
• Catalysts: Earnings, analyst changes, M&A, clinical trials, and SEC events.
• Strategic edges: Competitive moat and durable advantage analysis.
• Short interest & social sentiment: Short % float, social mention volume, and bullish/bearish breakdown.
• Macro context: Market regime and sector rotation alignment.

Deep dive: CNP research · FTS research. Sign in to StoQuant to run live comparisons for any tickers. Sign up free →